On 06/26/2017 01:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> (2017-06-26): >> I see no reason to not accept the stretch-pu. >> >> The issue with qgis and osgearth 2.8 / openscenegraph-3.4 only affects >> unstable. > > As I said: version constraints. stable must have a lower version than > the one in unstable. If this upload is accepted, that won't be the > case: > > qgis | 2.14.11+dfsg-3 | unstable | source, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x > qgis | 2.14.15+dfsg-1 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, mips qgis (2.14.15+dfsg-2) is now in testing, and unstable has -3: qgis | 2.14.15+dfsg-2 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x qgis | 2.14.15+dfsg-2 | unstable | source, armhf, hurd-i386 qgis | 2.14.15+dfsg-3 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x >> Once the qgis 2.14.16 passes the NEW queue and is moved to unstable, >> that issue is resolved too. > > Better be safe than sorry: let's wait on updated and buildable packages > in unstable before allowing this update in stretch. That would be now. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature