[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#849189: marked as done (mini transition: libcec)

Your message dated Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:01:46 +0100
with message-id <592f4290-7b9b-d1b1-25fe-f8ae77594a81@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#849189: mini transition: libcec
has caused the Debian Bug report #849189,
regarding mini transition: libcec
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
849189: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

I would like to update libcec in unstable to the 4.0 version because
kodi upstream switched to using it from kodi 17 beta 5. At the moment
kodi package is patched to use the older libcec 3 but this is an
undesirable divergence from upstream.

The mini transition would involve libcec and its single reverse
dependency, kodi, which I plan updating to beta6.

I'm aware of the transitions freeze but given the minimal impact and
risk of this transition I think it may get an exception.

Cheers,
Balint

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 18/01/17 16:38, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2017-01-18 0:05 GMT+01:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 23/12/16 12:19, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>>
>>> Dear Release Team,
>>>
>>> I would like to update libcec in unstable to the 4.0 version because
>>> kodi upstream switched to using it from kodi 17 beta 5. At the moment
>>> kodi package is patched to use the older libcec 3 but this is an
>>> undesirable divergence from upstream.
>>>
>>> The mini transition would involve libcec and its single reverse
>>> dependency, kodi, which I plan updating to beta6.
>>>
>>> I'm aware of the transitions freeze but given the minimal impact and
>>> risk of this transition I think it may get an exception.
>>
>> I don't think you need a transition bug when there's just one rdep and you
>> maintain it... But sure, go ahead. I think this warrants an exception.
> 
> Thanks! Usually I don't file bugs for libcec + kodi but since we are deep in the
> transition freeze I wanted to make sure that I perform the transition with
> Release Managers' approval.

This is finished; closing.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: