[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#843051: marked as done (transition: boost1.62)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Feb 2017 23:38:05 +0100
with message-id <ff219bc9-c643-c4d2-7608-f232227ad734@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#843051: release.debian.org: boost1.62 transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #843051,
regarding transition: boost1.62
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
843051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

boost-defaults has already been accepted to effectively start the
boost1.62 transition. Quite speedy NEW queue processing there.

smr and I, debate taking boost1.62 transition because it is a relatively
small jump; and there are openssl fixes. (boost doesn't directly link
against openssl, but the exposed templates do use openssl, thus boost is
entagled transitively into openssl transition for packages that use
relevant boost templates).

The rebuild results look ok:
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.62.html

Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable,
as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few packages in
Ubuntu that are not in Debian Testing, thus I expect binNMUs to behave
better in Debian. And I commit to fixing outstanding packages to the
best of my ability to complete this transition swiftly.

Ben transition tracker I used is as follows:

title = "Boost 1.62";

is_affected = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.6[012]/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.62/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libboost[a-z-.]*1\.6[01]/;

Adjust to taste.

Regards,

Dimitri.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 03/12/16 12:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/11/16 13:53, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable,
>> as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few packages in
>> Ubuntu that are not in Debian Testing, thus I expect binNMUs to behave
>> better in Debian. And I commit to fixing outstanding packages to the
>> best of my ability to complete this transition swiftly.
> 
> binNMUs have been done (took a while because of the mips* binutils/mesa issue).
> You can look at the failing packages now.

boost1.61 is finally gone from testing. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: