[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#758249: marked as done (transition: liblas)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:05:15 +0200
with message-id <53FE0FCB.6060905@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#758249: transition: liblas
has caused the Debian Bug report #758249,
regarding transition: liblas
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
758249: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758249
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html

Dear Release Team,

In the Debian GIS Team we would like to start a mini-transition for
liblas. Even though it is small, a binNMU will be required and we feel
it would be a good idea to check with you about the timing.

liblas (1.8.0) is available in experimental

pktools (2.5.3) is about to be uploaded to unstable and has been tested
and confirmed to build successfully against liblas 1.8.0. Pktools 2.5.3
also contains a fix to get it building on arm*.

The transition has been automatically detected:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html

We may get caught up in the perl 5.20 transition (causing a pause in the
middle), but in any case we believe the steps should be:

1) Wait for pktools 2.5.3 to migrate to testing
2) Verify that pktools built successfully on arm*
3) Move libLAS 1.8.0 from experimental to unstable
4) Verify that liblas has built on all architectures
5) binNMU pktools

Would it be okay to go ahead with this in the next few days?

Regards,

Ross

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 16/08/14 00:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 15/08/14 22:04, Ross Gammon wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
>>
>> Dear Release Team,
>>
>> In the Debian GIS Team we would like to start a mini-transition for
>> liblas. Even though it is small, a binNMU will be required and we feel
>> it would be a good idea to check with you about the timing.
>>
>> liblas (1.8.0) is available in experimental
>>
>> pktools (2.5.3) is about to be uploaded to unstable and has been tested
>> and confirmed to build successfully against liblas 1.8.0. Pktools 2.5.3
>> also contains a fix to get it building on arm*.
>>
>> The transition has been automatically detected:
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
>>
>> We may get caught up in the perl 5.20 transition (causing a pause in the
>> middle), but in any case we believe the steps should be:
>>
>> 1) Wait for pktools 2.5.3 to migrate to testing
>> 2) Verify that pktools built successfully on arm*
>> 3) Move libLAS 1.8.0 from experimental to unstable
>> 4) Verify that liblas has built on all architectures
>> 5) binNMU pktools
>>
>> Would it be okay to go ahead with this in the next few days?
> 
> Yes. Go ahead whenever you're ready.

It just entered testing. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: