[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#753079: marked as done (transition: librime)

Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:09:00 +0200
with message-id <53E0911C.8030907@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#753079: transition: librime
has caused the Debian Bug report #753079,
regarding transition: librime
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
753079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

We're planning to upload a new version of librime, which has ABI/API
breaks. The affected packages are few, and all under IME team's
maintenance, and we're mostly ready to have sourceful upload for
these packages:

Source: fcitx-rime
Source: ibus-rime

Ben file:

title = "librime";
is_affected = .depends ~ "librime0" | .depends ~ "librime1";
is_good = .depends ~ "librime1";
is_bad = .depends ~ "librime0";


Regards,

Yixuan

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 12/07/14 18:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 11/07/14 17:08, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 06:12:18PM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 03/07/14 21:36, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Osamu Aoki <osamu_aoki_home@nifty.com>
>>>>>> I will upload new git head when prompted.  Is it ready?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it is. (I just noticed you already uploaded it. Thanks a lot!)
>>>>
>>>> And it has failed on armel because of #727621.
>>>
>>> Thank you for noting this. It seems to be a rather difficult bug in gcc.
>>
>> Thanks from me too.
>>
>> But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address.
>> If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian.
>>
>> Unless we get some workaround patch, this is not something we can do
>> much about.
> 
> In the case of librime, the rdeps (fcitx-rime and ibus-rime) have never been
> built on armel. So you can ask for the removal of the outdated librime armel
> binaries (through a bug against ftp.debian.org) and then librime would be able
> to migrate. And when the armel issue is fixed and librime builds there, those
> binaries will migrate automatically.
> 
> Or you can make librime build on armel, like you mentioned in another mail. That
> would of course be preferred.

The latter happened, everything migrated.

Closing.
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: