[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704442: marked as done (unblock: devscripts/2.12.7 (pre-approval dch --bpo fix))

Your message dated Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:20:06 +0200
with message-id <20130402192006.GF5495@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#704442: unblock: devscripts/2.12.7 (pre-approval dch --bpo fix)
has caused the Debian Bug report #704442,
regarding unblock: devscripts/2.12.7 (pre-approval dch --bpo fix)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
704442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Dear Release Team,

In the current version of devscripts in wheezy, when invoking dch --bpo,
generates a changelog like this one:
devscripts (2.12.6~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low

It should of course use this instead:
devscripts (2.12.6~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urgency=low

Would the release team accept that I upload the attached fix to SID,
in order to fix this problem in Wheezy? I think it's rather minimal,
so it shouldn't be a big problem. Otherwise, I'm ok to wait for the
release, and upload the fix in wheezy-proposed-updates, though since
we already have backports opened, I think it would be wise not to
delay this fix too much.

Please let me know.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

diff -Nru devscripts-2.12.6/debian/changelog devscripts-2.12.7/debian/changelog
--- devscripts-2.12.6/debian/changelog	2012-11-25 07:49:03.000000000 +0800
+++ devscripts-2.12.7/debian/changelog	2013-03-21 23:36:50.000000000 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+devscripts (2.12.7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Now using ~bpo70+1 instead of ~bpo60+1 when invoking dch --bpo.
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>  Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:36:16 +0800
+
 devscripts (2.12.6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Actual install German translation.
diff -Nru devscripts-2.12.6/scripts/debchange.pl devscripts-2.12.7/scripts/debchange.pl
--- devscripts-2.12.6/scripts/debchange.pl	2012-07-07 06:29:24.000000000 +0800
+++ devscripts-2.12.7/scripts/debchange.pl	2013-03-21 23:38:18.000000000 +0800
@@ -613,8 +613,8 @@
 my $EMAIL = 'EMAIL';
 my $DISTRIBUTION = 'UNRELEASED';
 my $bpo_dist = '';
-my %bpo_dists = ( 60, 'squeeze' );
-my $latest_bpo_dist = '60';
+my %bpo_dists = ( 70, 'wheezy' );
+my $latest_bpo_dist = '70';
 my $CHANGES = '';
 # Changelog urgency, possibly propogated to NEWS files
 my $CL_URGENCY = '';

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Apr  2, 2013 at 01:21:58 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:

> Anyway, I don't think this is very critical. If you would like to forget
> about this until the release, and focus on more important things, I'm ok
> with that.
> 
Let's do that then.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: