Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> writes: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 19:07:38 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > >> What is clear is that the atlas binaries built on the amd64 buildds >> should not have the problem that is affecting the current amd64 binary >> (for example I tested the binary for 3.8.4-3 which was built on buildds >> and it is sane). So a binNMU seems a good short-term solution. >> > That's not clear to me. We have different buildds with different CPUs, > just because one version wasn't affected doesn't mean the next one won't > be. Looking again at atlas's build system, I realize that I was wrong: it *is* selecting the more generic set of processor instructions. So there is no need to modify the build system AFAIUI, sorry for the noise. But then I don't understand why the package built by the maintainer is broken. -- Sébastien Villemot Researcher in Economics & Debian Maintainer http://www.dynare.org/sebastien Phone: +33-1-40-77-84-04 - GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
pgpapmGQ8hBcq.pgp
Description: PGP signature