Bug#625792: [britney2] Needs to be cleverer at deciding which packages to check for installability

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, May  6, 2011 at 00:27:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > - unstable's ristretto doesn't depend on libthunar-vfs-1-2, so the
> > > package isn't marked for checking again
> > > 
> > hrm, but why does unstable's ristretto matter at that point, rather than
> > testing's?  (Apologies if I'm missing something obvious.)
> 
> It's not unstable's ristretto so much as unstable's thunar-vfs.
[...]
> I'm fairly sure one of my earlier debugging sessions included
> re-scanning for affected packages after the reverse dependency list had
> been updated, but it's not in my current version; I'll have another look
> at that.

I did that, and remembered why I removed the code after the first
attempt.  The dependencies of libthunar-vfs-1-2 are used to ensure it is
listed as a reverse dependency where appropriate, but we want to
recompute its r-dep list instead.

Regards,

Adam