Re: please tag #357255 sarge-ignore
- To: Debian Release Management <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
- Cc: 357255@bugs.debian.org, Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>, OHURA Makoto <ohura@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: please tag #357255 sarge-ignore
- From: Frank Küster <frank@kuesterei.ch>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:34:44 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 86ac407jor.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
- In-reply-to: <20061012215751.GI24449@mauritius.dodds.net> (Steve Langasek's message of "Thu\, 12 Oct 2006 15\:57\:51 -0600")
- References: <20060822110142.27388.65670.reportbug@mithrandir.pool8175.interbusiness.it> <864pw556wz.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20060822115651.GB6958@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <86ejv93qaf.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20060823084111.GC23873@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <86lkno2pon.fsf_-_@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20061012215751.GI24449@mauritius.dodds.net>
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:47:20PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > The author states that "the package is under GPLv2"
>
>> The author at least stated (in the bug log) that he's going to clean up
>> the licensing, and it's going to be either GPL or LPPL. I guess GPL,
>> since that seems to be the more recent choice. No matter which of them,
>> this bug should be kept open, but get a sarge-ignore tag. RMs, will you
>> do that?
>
> This bug is marked as "important" and therefore doesn't need an -ignore tag?
Sorry, somehow I mixed up bug numbers. Only the two (pgf and
latex-beamer) that you already have tagged need a tag. This one isn't
RC, it was just discussed for a possible NMU.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: