[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

new libc6 for potato is broken ? (was Re: Uploads to proposed-updates)



Anthony Towns <ajt@auric.debian.org> writes:

> --- glibc_2.1.3-17_i386.changes

Boot floppies won't compile with these changes.

gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -D_GNU_SOURCE -DBB_VER='"0.43"' -DBB_BT='"2001.01.23-23:34+0000"'  -c -o nfsmoun\
t.o nfsmount.c
In file included from /usr/include/linux/nfs_fs.h:26,
                 from /usr/include/linux/nfs_mount.h:13,
                 from nfsmount.c:53:
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:14: parse error before `__u64'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:14: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:15: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:16: parse error before `pre_ctime'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:16: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:18: parse error before `mode'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:18: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:19: parse error before `nlink'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:19: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:20: parse error before `uid'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:20: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:21: parse error before `gid'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:21: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:22: parse error before `size'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:22: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:25: parse error before `__u32'
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:25: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
/usr/include/linux/nfs_xdr.h:25: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union

It seems to me this libc6 stuff isn't well tested and shoudl not be
installed into Potato.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>



Reply to: