On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs > > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have > > been running it today with fairly conservative settings (18 months of > > inactivity for both ITP and ITA). (the script is available in > > collab-qa/retitle-old-ita-itp -- it's not run by cron yet ; see #501257 > > for an example bug modified by the script) > > Hi Lucas, > > I just got a couple of your retitling emails and have a couple of suggestions: > > - I think that it is better to close ITPs instead or retitling them RFPs, > otherwise we will perhaps accumulate a large number of inactive RFPs. I don't see a problem with that. Quite on the contrary, "loosing" info gathered during a failed packaging attempt could lead to double (wasted) work. So, I'd vote for retitling. Hauke -- .''`. Jan Hauke Rahm <jhr@debian.org> www.jhr-online.de : :' : Debian Developer www.debian.org `. `'` Member of the Linux Foundation www.linux.com `- Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe www.fsfe.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature