[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RC bugs in packages maintained by this list



On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 09:26:23AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > Is that the new way of threading people who speak up against a removal
> > > request for a package?
> > Show me the threat.
> Pardon, telling someone who speaks up against a removal for either
> maintainig the package or at "least make it suitable for release" is a
> kind of threading people to shup up.

Well, there's not much value in keeping a package around if it's never
made suitable for release is there? That's not exactly much to ask:
no security holes, valid copyright etc, installs okay, someone willing
to take some care and at least get it removed from any arches where it
doesn't build anymore.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it.
   C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who
    can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue."
		-- Mike Hoye,
		      see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt

Attachment: pgpUogSI_hiwB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: