[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810149: marked as done (pngtools: There is a SVN repository available with a bugfixes dated 2012)



Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2021 16:54:32 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] CA+7wUsyFLEWrzeB05YY4pt+MpzcBSq-jq5Nef-Pft7Lz7i2cww@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line There is a SVN repository available with a bugfixes dated 2012
has caused the Debian Bug report #810149,
regarding pngtools: There is a SVN repository available with a bugfixes dated 2012
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
810149: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pngtools
Severity: wishlist

Maybe something to package?

http://www.stillhq.com/svn/trunk/pngtools/

Changelog there:
20120106	Michael Still mikal@stillhq.com
		Include patches from gentoo project, thanks!

20081127	Michael Still mikal@stillhq.com
		Release 0.4, including 64 fixes

20020714	Michael Still mikal@stillhq.com
		Added the chunkdesc code


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: found -1 0.4-1
Control: fixed -1 0.5~git20120106.409eb16-1

Integrated all changes from the latest git.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: