[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#967148: marked as done (ispell-lt: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:33:44 +0000
with message-id <E1kIxmy-000HNP-Vl@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#967148: fixed in ispell-lt 1.3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #967148,
regarding ispell-lt: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
967148: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: src:ispell-lt
Version: 1.2.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

We will keep some Python2 package as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00039.html
but removing the unversioned python packages python-minimal, python,
python-dev, python-dbg, python-doc.

Your package either build-depends, depends on one of those packages.
Please either convert these packages to Python3, or if that is not
possible, replaces the dependencies on the unversioned Python
packages with one of the python2 dependencies (python2, python2-dev,
python2-dbg, python2-doc).

Please check for dependencies, build dependencies AND autopkg tests.

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-python@lists.debian.org mailing list.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ispell-lt
Source-Version: 1.3.2-1
Done: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ispell-lt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 967148@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> (supplier of updated ispell-lt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:25:52 +0200
Source: ispell-lt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Closes: 936753 967148
Changes:
 ispell-lt (1.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
 .
   [ upstream ]
   * new release(s)
 .
   [ Jonas Smedegaard ]
   * watch:
     + use file format 4
     + track Github source (see bug#936753)
     + use regex patterns
     + rewrite usage comment
   * track source in debian group on salsa.d.o,
     using git-buildpackage
   * build-depend on python3 (not python);
     closes: bug#936753, #967148,
     thanks to Matthias Klose and Rimas Kudelis
   * drop all patches: no longer apply
   * simplify build, and adapt to upstream changes
   * use debhelper compatibility level 12 (not 10);
     build-depend on debhelper-compat (not debhelper)
   * set Rules-Requires-Root: no
   * relax to (build-)depend unversioned
     on aspell dictionaries-common(-dev):
     needed versions satisfied even in oldstable
   * drop obsolete conflict on ispell
   * declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.0
Checksums-Sha1:
 9a967790911fd764e9f9565b3a749de3bb90b26c 1935 ispell-lt_1.3.2-1.dsc
 40f9b6efc496eb55a67579560d5bb6a2538e734c 667309 ispell-lt_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 7d6484e971d7cfff43b26fdafeb6ac27b690858e 6764 ispell-lt_1.3.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 a41a5e7edd921e37fafc942f19150ae2fee15606 6191 ispell-lt_1.3.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 41046e83fb55a873ea2518e211b7543e573f3b2785cb9c4025b992f88b846c8e 1935 ispell-lt_1.3.2-1.dsc
 2181efe8dd255e1123c4bdbb87e759ae72f0ac9fc6464e81f6dfec1582be71ed 667309 ispell-lt_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 3bdddd7e611a9f7a01b69d3f1912fd5afb4d05d7adce318246a475b18e1dcef8 6764 ispell-lt_1.3.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 14bf33226a595037036aedd002dba6385be8804e93b87241e118cf20eb03c033 6191 ispell-lt_1.3.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 e7e0c47a8ff0455a3302be2b2200443e 1935 text optional ispell-lt_1.3.2-1.dsc
 7fad4c927230244d7355773af8d74342 667309 text optional ispell-lt_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 f1af5c8b5e3907385909a8911a4996f1 6764 text optional ispell-lt_1.3.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 8111b0e8783f0994770094e4bfb3f8eb 6191 text optional ispell-lt_1.3.2-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=u48f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: