Bug#969843: marked as done (makebootfat: autopkgtest should be marked superficial)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:20:31 +0000
with message-id <E1kIeqt-000J3P-PI@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#969843: fixed in makebootfat 1.4-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #969843,
regarding makebootfat: autopkgtest should be marked superficial
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
969843: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969843
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: makebootfat
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elbrus@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'makebootfat' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html
Examples of tests which are not significant includes (its not a
complete list):
1) Executing the binary to check version
Test-Command: foo -v
Test-Command: foo -V
Test-Command: foo --version
2) Executing the binary to check help (foo -h)
Test-Command: foo -h
Test-Command: foo --help
3) checking for files installed with 'ls'.
Test-Command: ls -l /usr/lib/*/foo.so
4) A Python or Perl library runs import foo or require Foo; but does
not attempt to use the library beyond that.
Test-Command: python3 -c "import foo"
Please add "Restrictions: superficial" to 'debian/tests/control' of
'makebootfat'.
--
Sudip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: makebootfat
Source-Version: 1.4-8
Done: =?utf-8?q?H=C3=A5vard_Flaget_Aasen?= <haavard_aasen@yahoo.no>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
makebootfat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 969843@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Håvard Flaget Aasen <haavard_aasen@yahoo.no> (supplier of updated makebootfat package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 21:32:12 +0200
Source: makebootfat
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Håvard Flaget Aasen <haavard_aasen@yahoo.no>
Closes: 969843
Changes:
makebootfat (1.4-8) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* d/control:
- Add Rules-Requires-Root: no
- Bump debhelper to 13
* d/tests/control: Add Restrictions: superficial Closes: #969843
Checksums-Sha1:
c01af18d9108da74d4220b3d8e7e8a695e21e80c 1774 makebootfat_1.4-8.dsc
e7318c408b0f9bbfebcfef42b456c2629cf2061c 4280 makebootfat_1.4-8.debian.tar.xz
0abd229bab3e8c1a01c0547b153428e0b18066ca 5080 makebootfat_1.4-8_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
5da0129d20263795a72f86844e5ac49f0002ae37fb89aeac45b3b46e7f9b115c 1774 makebootfat_1.4-8.dsc
fcd25563d7529105a13cb428b676308844bc85eea0e08dff33f22f6917fd4d51 4280 makebootfat_1.4-8.debian.tar.xz
a467c64785c6bfa4220c2b597011054796fcd6728db9636299127a3756ed00d1 5080 makebootfat_1.4-8_source.buildinfo
Files:
58aeee46268c67df6d36f7526488aae1 1774 utils optional makebootfat_1.4-8.dsc
926ec6c6f0f3691cc6d63b5a99aa13ea 4280 utils optional makebootfat_1.4-8.debian.tar.xz
f62c74ace1ec12e8d68ae822ea90d437 5080 utils optional makebootfat_1.4-8_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=w+4X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: