[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#906133: marked as done (ocrodjvu: Please make Tesseract messages less confusing)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:25:00 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1iYHMK-0001pv-3Q@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#945183: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #906133,
regarding ocrodjvu: Please make Tesseract  messages less confusing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
906133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: ocrodjvu
Version: 0.10.4-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi!

I run ocrodjvu with "-j 3" and get the following messages:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
tesseract: Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine v4.0.0-beta.3-249-g607e with Leptonica
tesseract: Page 1
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
- Page #90
- Page #91
- Page #92
tesseract: Tesseract Open Source OCR Engine v4.0.0-beta.3-249-g607e with Leptonica
tesseract: Page 1
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
tesseract: no best words!!
- Page #93
- Page #94
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I have no idea to which page Tesseract refers as " Page 1" and to which
pages " no best words!!" applies.

Is using "-j 1" the only solution?

BTW, I'm unable to find any explanation of the "no best words!!"
message. Use the force, read the source? :-)

Best regards

Janusz


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages ocrodjvu depends on:
ii  djvulibre-bin                          3.5.27.1-9
ii  libpython2.7-stdlib [python-argparse]  2.7.15-3
ii  python                                 2.7.15-3
ii  python-djvu                            0.8.1-1

Versions of packages ocrodjvu recommends:
ii  python-html5lib      1.0.1-1
ii  python-lxml          4.2.3-1
ii  python-pyicu         2.0.3-1+b2
ii  python-subprocess32  3.5.2-1
ii  tesseract-ocr        4.00~git2844-607e8fd8-2

Versions of packages ocrodjvu suggests:
pn  cuneiform  <none>
pn  gocr       <none>
pn  ocrad      <none>

-- no debconf information

-- 
             ,   
Janusz S. Bien
emeryt (emeritus)
https://sites.google.com/view/jsbien

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.11-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ocrodjvu has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/945183

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: