Bug#893424: marked as done (Cannot uninstall package)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:20:08 +0000
with message-id <E1ey50a-000Cco-3x@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#893424: fixed in sendmail 8.15.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #893424,
regarding Cannot uninstall package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
893424: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893424
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sendmail-base
Version: 8.15.2-10
Severity: serious
Due to a bug in the maintainer script, sendmail-base cannot be uninstalled:
rak@zeta:~$ sudo apt-get remove sendmail-base
[sudo] password for rak:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
lockfile-progs
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove it.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
sendmail-base
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 52 not upgraded.
After this operation, 867 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
(Reading database ... 388617 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing sendmail-base (8.15.2-10) ...
rm: cannot remove '/etc/mail/m4': Is a directory
dpkg: error processing package sendmail-base (--remove):
installed sendmail-base package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 123
Errors were encountered while processing:
sendmail-base
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
rak@zeta:~$ sudo apt-get purge sendmail-base
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
lockfile-progs
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove it.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
sendmail-base*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 52 not upgraded.
After this operation, 867 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
(Reading database ... 388617 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing sendmail-base (8.15.2-10) ...
rm: cannot remove '/etc/mail/m4': Is a directory
dpkg: error processing package sendmail-base (--remove):
installed sendmail-base package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 123
Errors were encountered while processing:
sendmail-base
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- Package-specific info:
Output of /usr/share/bug/sendmail-base/script:
ls -alR /etc/mail:
/etc/mail:
total 24
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 138 Mar 18 14:32 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5364 Mar 18 13:50 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 281 Jan 13 17:43 address.resolve
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Jan 13 17:43 m4
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16 Mar 18 13:30 peers
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12235 Mar 18 13:33 sendmail.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 148 Jan 13 17:43 service.switch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 179 Jan 13 17:43 service.switch-nodns
/etc/mail/m4:
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Jan 13 17:43 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 138 Mar 18 14:32 ..
/etc/mail/peers:
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16 Mar 18 13:30 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 138 Mar 18 14:32 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 328 Jan 13 17:43 provider
sendmail.conf:
DAEMON_NETMODE="Static";
DAEMON_NETIF="eth0";
DAEMON_MODE="Daemon";
DAEMON_PARMS="";
DAEMON_HOSTSTATS="No";
DAEMON_MAILSTATS="No";
QUEUE_MODE="${DAEMON_MODE}";
QUEUE_INTERVAL="10m";
QUEUE_PARMS="";
MSP_MODE="Cron";
MSP_INTERVAL="20m";
MSP_PARMS="";
MSP_MAILSTATS="${DAEMON_MAILSTATS}";
MISC_PARMS="";
CRON_MAILTO="root";
CRON_PARMS="";
LOG_CMDS="No";
HANDS_OFF="No";
AGE_DATA="";
DAEMON_RUNASUSER="No";
DAEMON_STATS="${DAEMON_MAILSTATS}";
MSP_STATS="${MSP_MAILSTATS}";
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_CA.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_CA.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages sendmail-base depends on:
ii adduser 3.117
ii lockfile-progs 0.1.17+b1
ii m4 1.4.18-1
ii make 4.2.1-1
ii netbase 5.4
ii perl 5.26.1-5
sendmail-base recommends no packages.
Versions of packages sendmail-base suggests:
ii ca-certificates 20170717
pn logcheck <none>
ii logrotate 3.11.0-0.1
pn resolvconf <none>
pn sendmail-doc <none>
-- no debconf information
--
|)|/ Ryan Kavanagh | GPG: 4E46 9519 ED67 7734 268F
|\|\ https://rak.ac | BD95 8F7B F8FC 4A11 C97A
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sendmail
Source-Version: 8.15.2-11
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sendmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 893424@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> (supplier of updated sendmail package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:49:16 +0100
Source: sendmail
Binary: sendmail-bin rmail sensible-mda libmilter1.0.1 libmilter-dev sendmail-doc sendmail sendmail-base sendmail-cf
Architecture: source
Version: 8.15.2-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Description:
libmilter-dev - Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter) (development files)
libmilter1.0.1 - Sendmail Mail Filter API (Milter)
rmail - MTA->UUCP remote mail handler
sendmail - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (metapacka
sendmail-base - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (arch inde
sendmail-bin - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent
sendmail-cf - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (config ma
sendmail-doc - powerful, efficient, and scalable Mail Transport Agent (documenta
sensible-mda - Mail Delivery Agent wrapper
Closes: 893424
Changes:
sendmail (8.15.2-11) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Fix prerm failure on btrfs. (Closes: #893424)
* Convert upstream signing key to .asc format.
* sendmail-doc: Mark as Multi-Arch: foreign.
* libmilter-dev: Mark as Multi-Arch: same.
* Fix new Lintian issues.
* Update Lintian overrides.
* Switch Vcs-* URLs to salsa.debian.org.
Checksums-Sha1:
63d5a377305d12b177d22d158a960f1779649a72 2565 sendmail_8.15.2-11.dsc
43fe34b71f0290178e942aca7f3a1f02c07b2ea1 412772 sendmail_8.15.2-11.debian.tar.xz
a1cb9de19bfdf2648c89a23649b16a4d32372698 6075 sendmail_8.15.2-11_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
64c2938900a489b3f928c3dc2c5ff6f3da88510c5292305e7ec5d89e9ee87e1c 2565 sendmail_8.15.2-11.dsc
48932758d4d4ec3afe050d724f8b7e1c5ee1648db9d2a100ec76966b8d40a066 412772 sendmail_8.15.2-11.debian.tar.xz
abf24ef33dd75d8e3bbf9579d38f12e4e54ba3f9a351b84d2a5f463307d3edcf 6075 sendmail_8.15.2-11_source.buildinfo
Files:
0511d2da05fe99dcf0952b62920a7a23 2565 mail optional sendmail_8.15.2-11.dsc
43648c3c14d7be14772d65f736aed4b2 412772 mail optional sendmail_8.15.2-11.debian.tar.xz
1ce1e9a827a143968b5b865f13353f77 6075 mail optional sendmail_8.15.2-11_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=K1nu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: