[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#172728: marked as done (fullscreen option would be nice)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:06:10 +0100
with message-id <200808040806.m7486A4k007279@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line falconseye has been removed from Debian, closing #172728
has caused the Debian Bug report #172728,
regarding fullscreen option would be nice
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
172728: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=172728
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: falconseye
Version: 1.9.3-8
Severity: wishlist

It would be really nice to have a fullscreen option for falconseye
(and it should be very easy, since it's just an SDL initialization
option.)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux starless 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages falconseye depends on:
ii  debconf                   1.2.16         Debian configuration management sy
ii  falconseye-data           1.9.3-8        Data files for Falcon's Eye
ii  libc6                     2.3.1-5        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5               5.3.20021109-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsdl1.2debian           1.2.4-1        Simple DirectMedia Layer

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.9.3-16+rm

The falconseye package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/320075 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org

--- End Message ---
Reply to: