Bug#39388: marked as done (epan: Source package conatins binaries)
Your message dated 26 Aug 2002 03:06:59 +0200
with message-id <8765xyh1ho.fsf@fuzz.uucp>
and subject line Bug#39388: epan: Source package conatins binaries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 1999 11:51:21 +0000
Received: (qmail 9577 invoked from network); 12 Jun 1999 11:51:20 -0000
Received: from hobbe.lub.lu.se (root@130.235.32.3)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 1999 11:51:20 -0000
Received: from hakan@localhost by hobbe.LUB.lu.se id <127320-2789>; Sat, 12 Jun 1999 13:51:14 +0200
Sender: hakan@hobbe.LUB.lu.se
From: hakan@debian.org
Subject: epan: Source package conatins binaries
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 2.95
Message-Id: <19990612115115Z127320-2789+505@hobbe.LUB.lu.se>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 13:51:14 +0200
Package: epan
Version: 1.3.1-1
Hi,
the source packahg of epan should contain the sourcecode, not the binaries
as thisone does.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 1.3
Kernel Version: Linux hobbe 2.0.36 #1 Fri Dec 18 15:31:33 CET 1998 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages epan depends on:
libc6 Version: 2.1.1-0.1
libforms0.88 Version: 0.88.1-1
libpcap0 Version: 0.4a6-2
xlib6g Version: 3.3.3.1-5
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 39388-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2002 01:50:29 +0000
>From mvela@public.srce.hr Sun Aug 25 20:50:29 2002
Return-path: <mvela@public.srce.hr>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17j91Q-0006dY-00; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 20:50:29 -0500
Received: from fuzz.uucp (mail@a162.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.129.42])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7Q1naYx003167
for <39388-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:49:37 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17j8LL-00011H-00
for <39388-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:06:59 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 39388-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#39388: epan: Source package conatins binaries
References: <19990612115115Z127320-2789+505@hobbe.LUB.lu.se>
Date: 26 Aug 2002 03:06:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: <19990612115115Z127320-2789+505@hobbe.LUB.lu.se>
Message-ID: <8765xyh1ho.fsf@fuzz.uucp>
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@public.srce.hr>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Delivered-To: 39388-done@bugs.debian.org
Unfortunately, the epan source code was never released, so we have to
stick to binaries. Other packages like distributed-net-pproxy or
jdk1.1 are in the same situation.
The upstream author used to be a Debian developer, so I'm sure he's
already aware of the virtues of free software and unlikely to change
his mind (and his mail bounces).
Thanks,
Matej
Reply to: