Re: New upstream version for python-pint

[Antonio Valentino <antonio.valentino@tiscali.it>]

Dear Alexandre, dear Thomas,

Il 01/04/24 21:32, Alexandre Detiste ha scritto:
> I've packaged font-awesome5 at work, for sure it's not in Debian.
>
> The upgrade to v5 was rightfully reverted but it's in limbo since.
>
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/fonts-font-awesome
>
> fonts-font-awesome (5.0.10+really4.7.0~dfsg-4.1)  <------------------
> Please note that this package provides Font Awesome 4
> (not Font Awesome 5 or Font Awesome 6 which are different fonts with
> different licensing).

Thanks for the info.

> Le lun. 1 avr. 2024 à 21:26, Antonio Valentino
> <antonio.valentino@tiscali.it> a écrit :
> > Dear Thomas,
> >
> > Il 01/04/24 17:52, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
> > > On 3/31/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino wrote:
> > > > Dear Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
> > > > > On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote:
> > > > > > Dear Thomas and Ondřej,
> > > > > > a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in
> > > > > > python-pint (#1067318).
> > > > > > I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should
> > > > > > be sufficient to fix the issue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you agree, I would like prepare the package for the new upstream
> > > > > > version in the salsa.
> > > > > > Of course I will let to you the review and upload.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > kind regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Please go ahead and feel free to add yourself as uploader.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Thomas
> > > > The packages is now updated in salsa.
> > > > Unfortunately the reprotest job fails in CI, but I'm not able to
> > > > reproduce on my laptop and it seems not to be a regression.
> > > > I will try to fix it in future uploads but for the moment I would
> > > > prefer to have an upload to fix a couple of RC bugs.
> > > >
> > > > Could you please review and upload?
> > > >
> > > > I have also put myself as uploader.
> > > > I'm a DM so I kindly ask you to grant me upload permissions as
> > > > described in [3].
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > kind regards
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Thanks for the work Antonio.
> > >
> > > 1/ In the clean target, please also clean:
> > > - Pint.egg-info
> > > - docs/savefig
> > >
> > > 2/ There's a typo in d/changelog, you wrote: "d/copuright".
> > >
> > > 3/ I'm really not sure about the python-pint-doc.lintian-overrides
> > > overriding "font-in-non-font-package". Can't you use the fonts from
> > > system instead?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> >
> > 1/ and 2/ are now fixed
> >
> > For 3/ I indeed did a quick search but I was not able to find a font
> > package providing the needed fonts
> >
> > $ apt-file search fa-brands-400.ttf
> > gnunet:
> > /usr/share/doc/gnunet/html/_static/vendor/fontawesome/6.1.2/webfonts/fa-brands-400.ttf.gz
> > icinga-php-library:

[CUT]

> > Maybe node-fortawesome-fontawesome-free, but the version seems not to be
> > the same.
> > Actually I'm not really sure where these fonts are collected during the
> > build process.
> >
> > Do you have any hint?

Ok, I think that the most convenient solution at the moment is to 
replace the vendored fonts with the ones provided by the 
python3-pydata-sphinx-theme package. This is not ideal because 
python3-pydata-sphinx-theme vendors the fonts itself but at least we 
avoid duplications.

The change is already in salsa.
Please Thomas, let me know if this is acceptable for you.

Unfortunately the package is not currently buildable because of an 
update in python3-lxml that determined #1068349 [1]


[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068349


kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino