Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy
From: weepingclown <weepingclown@disroot.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:25:49 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 3F4EDBE0-FA64-4640-BC9E-0CCFB4503A5F@disroot.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Zd2X2ORxdrGX5E7Z@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] Zd2X2ORxdrGX5E7Z@an3as.eu>

While perfectly understanding the weak collaboration model reasoning, I've still always found DPT as uploader and not maintainer rather absurd TBH. The current go to tool (as I understand it) for python packaging, py2dsp, also creates an initial packaging with team in uploaders section and the person as maintainer; something that I find even more absurd. Not only would I welcome this suggested change, I also think it is better if py2dsp default to starting with DPT as maintainers.

Best,
Ananthu

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

References:
- Suggesting change in DPT policy
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy
Next by Date: Re: dh_python3: file in /usr/lib/python3.12/dist-packages ?
Previous by thread: Re: Maintaining packages with complex relationships (Was: Suggesting change in DPT policy)
Next by thread: Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread