Re: RFS: pyxdg 0.24-1

[Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk>]

On 6 November 2012 13:18, Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@debian.org> wrote:

I am thinking to upload to experimental instead of unstable. It's a
few upstream releases jump and a python3 package is introduced.
This makes this changes unsuitable for unstable considering that we
are currently frozen and these changes are not appropriate for wheezy
at this time.
Is that ok with you? Or did you intend to upload into unstable?

That's fine by me. I see myself primarily as the upstream here, offering the package to Debian to use as you will.

In that case, I'll submit it separately to Ubuntu, as it won't be synced from experimental. Thanks for letting me know.

Best wishes,
Thomas