[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packaging question on private extension modules



Le samedi 31 mai 2008 à 22:00 +0200, Manuel Prinz a écrit :
> I have a Python application with private extension modules, so the package is 
> Arch: any. Because there is no way (at least I'm not aware of that) to split 
> the package because the modules are private, I can't seperate the large part 
> of the app out to /usr/share/package/ because the extension module parts 
> under /usr/lib/package/ can't be loaded. Is there a way to do that or is the 
> recommended way to put everything to /usr/lib/package/ even thought large 
> parts are arch-indep?

At least, current practice in this case is to put everything
in /usr/lib.

> Also, is it OK to build just against the default Python version in Debian or 
> should all versions be supported? Upstream's build system does not enable to 
> build against a specific version of Python.

For private extensions, it is quite complex to support multiple python
versions as you need a specific rtupdate script, so in general you
should not do that.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: