also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> [2005.08.09.1245 +0200]: > > I am not sure this is such a good idea for privacy reasons. If I > > mail mirrors@, I am not warned that my message will be publicly > > readable. > > You actually thought correspondence with a free software project would > be non-public? I find that rather unusual. I am not corresponding with a free software project, I am corresponding with a mirror team. And it's not unusual. If you lost your password and mailed debian-admin about it, you wouldn't want it public, right? Good, because it won't be. > I would say that unless explicitly told otherwise, the correspondence > with the project addresses should be expected to be public, and see no > problem in sending the mirrors@ address into a publicly available > forum. Feel free to make a change and announce it. I never saw an announcement that on July 1, the mirror submission form would automatically file bugs. I don't oppose to this, but I certainly oppose to it "just happening". -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "administration for windows networks is similar to maintaining a 12 year old gm truck. brand new, w2k+3 already has 190k miles of wear." -- jeremiah cornelius
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)