Re: debian domains

[Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

> Regardless, I would start by accepting Gregg's offer and
> using domain dispute procedures for the "removed" ones, if
> we want the domain. I think the first one is the registrar at
> http://www.enom.com/terms/drp.asp and this seems straightforward,
> covered by 4.a., 4.b.(i) and (iv).  Will the DPL dispute it,
> does SPI need to, is there a better delegate or should a random
> DD act?

Our trademarks are held by SPI, so I'd assume that we need to act
through them. I'd suggest simply sending a cease and desist type message
to the current holders before resorting to dispute resolution procedures
- it generally looks better if you've tried to settle things quietly
first.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.project@srcf.ucam.org