also sprach Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> [2005.03.04.1016 +0100]: > > I think it would be helpful if (in future) the release team would > > communicate their list of release criteria well in advance of their > > estimated time of release. > > I don't know what you'll consider as release criteria, but if you mean > the list at http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt - that's > unchanged for quite a long while now. "well in advance" -- with that he means that etch's release plan should ideally be ready and *final* by the time sarge is released. I agree. As I see it, we'll release sarge, and the project will return to idling until someone somewhere decides to call for a freeze. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature