Re: ofpath vs ofpathname vs grub-ofpathname
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:48:47PM +0000, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 4/17/20 9:18 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:28:37AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > On 4/17/20 1:18 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
> > > > There was no forgetting; only a misreading of the original message
> > > > when skim-reading due to being in a hurry. You have a habbit of
> > > > making negative assumptions of people who are only trying to help
> > > > which is, frankly, not appreciated.
> > >
> > > Not sure how asking whether you may have forgotten to switch the branch a
> > > negative assumption. I'm not sure what else I'm supposed to do when I
> > > have doubts about the test result.
> >
> > The bit about "has the appearance of..." was fine. I agree that it did
> > have that appearance. It was following it up with "didn't you?" which
> > was both unnecessary and an untrue accusation. In NZ English that
> > phrase is often used very negatively of people and ....
>
> When did people get so damn sensitive?
>
> I am happy with anything JPAG[1] has to say in any language any way he
> damn well wants.
You may well be, but that is not the standard expected of those posting
to Debian email lists [1].
> That is not just because he is doing heavy lifting but
> because of language barriers and damn it in open source we should all
> just be happy someone is there helping out with us and quite frankly for
> us. Otherwise take it up with your HR department and bring a box of
> tissue for your sensitive eyes.
Your comments are not helpful. The matter was between Adrian and
myself and is resolved.
Cheers.
Michael.
[1] See under "Code of Conduct" of https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/
and https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
Reply to: