Bug#671503: APT repository format is not documented
- To: Michal Suchanek <michal.suchanek@ruk.cuni.cz>
- Cc: 671503@bugs.debian.org, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#671503: APT repository format is not documented
- From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 03:51:04 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120521085104.GB5304@burratino>
- Reply-to: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, 671503@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1337588213-sup-796@virtual.ruk.cuni.cz>
- References: <87mx55lqbo.fsf@frosties.localnet> <20406.11351.808519.174392@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20120518133148.GA20358@debian.org> <20120518144017.GA21269@debian.org> <1337349939-sup-8754@virtual.ruk.cuni.cz> <20120518185407.GA15468@debian.org> <CAKTje6GW9k_p_7Ch-kZWnSXNpiwdbs3hXu1Cyw_QjMGaYDh_ng@mail.gmail.com> <20120519135807.GA6788@debian.org> <CAAZ6_fBYbJ8mqXSsMDjM3NaXq9V62USw3W-3JUEa-8En=47EWw@mail.gmail.com> <1337588213-sup-796@virtual.ruk.cuni.cz>
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The sources.list is *the* file that specifies where to look for
> repositories, even for non-apt clients.
dselect uses a different format for /var/lib/dpkg/cmethopt and
/var/lib/dpkg/<method>/*. Most of the other non-apt package managers
I know are apt clones. If I remember correctly, reprepro can pull
from one APT repository to populate another and does not use
sources.list format, either.
Using the sources.list format to illustrate terminology doesn't seem
like a bad idea, though.
Hope that helps,
Jonathan
Reply to: