[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Patch for MultiarchCross



On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:17:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

> >> What could be allowed is using the new include paths with a Depends on
> >> the multiarch package even if the package itself is not multiarch.

> > No.  multiarch-support declares runtime support for ld.so.  It has nothing
> > to do with include paths (or -dev packages in general) and should not be
> > abused like this.

> Will there be a multiarch-dev-support then or will -dev packages have to
> Depends on the right versions of a number of build tools?

Why do you need either?  What real problem are you trying to solve?

multiarch-support is needed to ensure users's systems don't render
themselves completely unusable in the middle of an upgrade. 
multiarch-dev-support would be a lot of work to solve something that is
merely an inconvenience - a compile-time error that requires the user to
upgrade to the current gcc on i386 to fix.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: