Re: Bug#88029: allow rules file to be non-makefile
Brian,
I don't consider make to be a language. ;)
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/CM>CC/IT d- s:+ a16 C++(++++)>$ UL++++>$ P--- L++>++$ E+ W+(-) N+ o? K? w---()
!O !M !V PS+(++)>+ PE-(--) Y+>+ PGP t+>++ !5 X-- R>++ tv(+) b+(++) DI(+) D++
G>+++ e--> h! !r y>+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
On 1 Mar 2001, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org> writes:
>
> Alexander> My point: Using interpreted languages in rules files
> Alexander> should be avoided. Otherwise thou canst not build eg
> Alexander> python without already having python installed... and
> Alexander> you get a chicken-and-egg problem. Ouch.
>
> You don't consider make to be an interpreted language?
> --
> Brian May <bam@debian.org>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
Reply to: