Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 11:54:58 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > | If no manual page is available for a particular program, utility or
> > | function and this is reported as a bug on debian-bugs, a symbolic link
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I think this is a stupid policy and should be changed.
Care to provide reasons?
I think this is a sensible policy: all executables in the regular path
should have manpages (if only to point to documentation in a different
format); lack of such a manpage is a bug; bugs should be reported to the
BTS. A report in the BTS means there is a problem that ought to be fixed. We
all know how different the real world is from the ideal one, so we
understand that a maintainer might not have the time or the inclanation to
fix it, but we have never had a restriction that only maintainers can fix
bugs in packages. Having missing manpages listed in the BTS can also for
instance help volunteers who want to contribute documentation.
Ray
--
J.H.M. Dassen | RUMOUR Believe all you hear. Your world may
jdassen@wi.LeidenUniv.nl | not be a better one than the one the blocks
| live in but it'll be a sight more vivid.
| - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Next by Date:
Bug#39398: debian-policy has an unclear statement on dependancies and priorities
- Previous by thread:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Next by thread:
Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something
- Index(es):