Hello again, Martin Pitt [2014-09-09 8:04 +0200]: > Ah, good. I did that. I created https://titanpad.com/jQv06Sq0up to > coordinate this, I also added the command for the testing loop that I > use. I ran over 1.400 package tests on my laptop today (titanpad is up to date), and so far the results look rather promising. There are 168 failures (https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/tmp/perl-failures/) and 94 packages which don't have tests (at the end of the pad), i. e. which should be removed from the whitelist. That means that the other ~ 1150 packages succeeded. If nobody else gets to it, I can run the second half of the batch tomorrow, and then produce the final source package lists for "passed", "failed", and "no tests", so that we can use the "passed" one as whitelist in ci.d.n. I haven't looked through the logs at all. It's very likely that there's some groups of related failures which can be fixed centrally in pkg-perl-tools, and then surely the long tail of individual failures. I suggest we start using the whitelist with the "passed" ones to avoid showing hundreds of new failures. Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature