[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#920020: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100
with message-id <20190125173036.GE26300@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module.
has caused the Debian Bug report #919883,
regarding javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
919883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919883
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: openjdk-11-jdk
Version: 11.0.2+7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (attach-javadocs) on project octopus-rpctunnel: MavenReportException: Error while generating Javadoc: 
[ERROR] Exit code: 1 - javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module.

The cause for this is:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212233

The fix is (not tested by myself):

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8ce4083fc831
via:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217177

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages openjdk-11-jdk depends on:
ii  libc6                    2.28-5
ii  openjdk-11-jdk-headless  11.0.2+7-1
ii  openjdk-11-jre           11.0.2+7-1
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

Versions of packages openjdk-11-jdk recommends:
pn  libxt-dev  <none>

Versions of packages openjdk-11-jdk suggests:
pn  openjdk-11-demo    <none>
pn  openjdk-11-source  <none>
pn  visualvm           <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:6.1.5~rc1-1

On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 01:02:33PM +0000, peter green wrote:
>    The arch all build for libreoffice 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 (
>    [1]https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=all&ver=1%3A6.1.5%7Erc1-1&stamp=1547977527&raw=0
>    ) failed with
> 
>  > javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in [2]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module.

Was fixed in above, see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920331 and
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1024343/accepted-libreoffice-1615rc1-2-source-into-unstable/

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---
Reply to: