Processed: [bts-link] source package openoffice.org-draw,openoffice.org-impress
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package openoffice.org-draw,openoffice.org-impress
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #425276
> # * http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77672
> # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> INVALID
> # * closed upstream
> tags 425276 + fixed-upstream
Bug#425276: Shape problems in Impress
Tags were: confirmed
Bug#425528: openoffice.org-draw 2.2.1-rc1 gets basic shapes wrong
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> usertags 425276 - status-NEW
Bug#425276: Shape problems in Impress
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 425276 + status-RESOLVED resolution-INVALID
Bug#425276: Shape problems in Impress
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-INVALID status-RESOLVED.
> # remote status report for #425528
> # * http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77672
> # * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
> # * remote resolution changed: (?) -> INVALID
> # * closed upstream
> tags 425528 + fixed-upstream
Bug#425528: openoffice.org-draw 2.2.1-rc1 gets basic shapes wrong
Tags were: fixed-upstream confirmed
Bug#425276: Shape problems in Impress
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> usertags 425528 - status-NEW
Bug#425528: openoffice.org-draw 2.2.1-rc1 gets basic shapes wrong
Usertags were: status-NEW.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 425528 + status-RESOLVED resolution-INVALID
Bug#425528: openoffice.org-draw 2.2.1-rc1 gets basic shapes wrong
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-INVALID status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Reply to: