[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [was: generation of ocamldoc HTML documentation for libs (via cdbs)] OCaml policy for documentation



On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:33:35AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> Which make it almost useless for me since almost all variants
> in my code are polymorphic variants, and the meaning of these
> data types is the primary thing that needs documentation ;(

No problem, just don't use it. I bet for the 99% of the code me need to
document in Debian (which, I remind you, was the topic of this thread)
polymorphic variants are just a small part of the code, far from being
the primary thing that needs documentation.

> So in effect ocamldoc works on the code 'after preprocessing'?
> [Make sense, I just didn't know since I don't use any preprocessing]

So you where whining for the lack of a feature you don't need?

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: