[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Moritz Schlarb: Application Manager report



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

It's the 2nd time that Moritz is completely unresponsive. The first time,
it went from 17th of Feb. to 3rd of Jul. with no answer. I told Moritz that
he must tell me if such thing happens, but this is happening again.

This not only shows the lack of motivation. It also is troublesome for me as
the AM, and for anyone that may interact with him if this happens again in
the future. This would not be a problem if the lack of response was only for
this application. But looking at some BTS entries (which I don't remember but
can easily find again if asked), I found the same lack of responsivity, even
though it feels like he knew the answer.

The application from Moritz started in 2022. We're now 9 month later. That
is very unusual if a NM is assigned to me. I pay a lot of attention to
process replies in a timely maner. I feel like I'm wasting my time in this
case, as I have to re-read answers again, and again to remember where we
were at.

Therefore, I am afraid I have no choice but to reject Moritz application.
The lack of responsivness may be a problem with his interaction with other
members of the project, and this isn't what one would expect from other DDs.

I do have to insist that there was no technical issue in this application, and
Moritz seems to have the necessary skills. I'm very much OK if Moritz re-apply
later on, if he decides to reply faster.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand <zigo>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=GUOg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thomas Goirand (via nm.debian.org)

For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1077/
-- 
https://nm.debian.org/process/1077/


Reply to: