[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: porterboxes vs. qemu



On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:16:52 -0800 (PST)
<jscottkasten@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
> > It would be a shame if packagers abandoned MIPS for lack of hardware
> > for debugging ... Does anyone know if replacement/repair of mahler
> > is on anyones to do list?

> It would be nice if Cavium or one of the Chinese manufacturers like
> Lemote would donate some Octeon, Yeelong, Longsoon or what ever based
> equipment.  That would get us up on some modern equipment with a
> longer lifespan, not to mention that those newer CPUs are quite
> zippy. As those companies depend on a Linux based SDK to sell chips,
> I would think we all have a common interest here.

AIUI the systems I mentioned in my other email (the ones waiting to
stabilise correctly) are Lemote Fuloongs.

> Regards,
> 
> -S-
> 
> 


-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: