Re: Making packages binNMU safe

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Making packages binNMU safe
From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 08:33:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] ZUNQsb4tiYiGZ2om@durkon.wrar.name>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ab551295-be17-4d85-fefe-f9daf6efdb7e@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] ab551295-be17-4d85-fefe-f9daf6efdb7e@gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 07:54:16AM +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote:
> WWW page https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU doesn't mention the case arch:all
> package depending another arch:all package when it discussed making packages
> binNMU safe. How is this case handled?
arch: all packages arent rebuilt so I'm not sure what problems do you have
in mind, can you elaborate?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Making packages binNMU safe
  - From: Tommi Höynälänmaa <tommi.hoynalanmaa@gmail.com>

References:
- Making packages binNMU safe
  - From: Tommi Höynälänmaa <tommi.hoynalanmaa@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Making packages binNMU safe
Next by Date: Bug#1055213: RFS: bluraybackup/1.0-1 [ITP] -- Backup BDMV from the command line
Previous by thread: Making packages binNMU safe
Next by thread: Re: Making packages binNMU safe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread