[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#960336: marked as done (RFS: gtkorvo-libenet/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- Georgia Tech fork of libenet)

Your message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:51:38 +0100
with message-id <ZUIDijap2NorXeCK@isildor2.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Closing ancient RFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #960336,
regarding RFS: gtkorvo-libenet/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- Georgia Tech fork of libenet
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
960336: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960336
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@debian.org

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkorvo-libenet":

 * Package name    : gtkorvo-libenet
   Version         : 1.3.15-1
   Upstream Author : Lee Salzman
 * URL             : https://github.com/GTkorvo/enet
 * License         : other
 * Vcs             : https://gitlab.kitware.com/debian/gtkorvo-libenet
   Section         : libs

It builds those binary packages:

  gtkorvo-libenet-dev - Georgia Tech fork of libenet -
development files
  gtkorvo-libenet7 - Georgia Tech fork of libenet
  gtkorvo-libenet-doc - Georgia Tech fork of libenet -
documentation

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://gitlab.kitware.com/debian/gtkorvo-libenet

Regards,

--
  Kyle Edwards

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Those RFS are in the "moreinfo" state since more than two years, some of
them are even from 2020, and there has been no follow up from the
submitter of the RFS. Therefore I'm closing them as non actionable.

-- 
tobi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: