[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#960049: marked as done (RFS: libatl/2.2.2-1 [ITP] -- Binary representation of lists of name/value pairs)

Your message dated Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:51:38 +0100
with message-id <ZUIDijap2NorXeCK@isildor2.loewenhoehle.ip>
and subject line Closing ancient RFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #960049,
regarding RFS: libatl/2.2.2-1 [ITP] -- Binary representation of lists of name/value pairs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
960049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libatl":

 * Package name    : libatl
   Version         : 2.2.2-1
   Upstream Author : Georgia Tech Research Corporation
 * URL             : https://github.com/GTkorvo/atl
 * License         : BSD-3-clause
 * Vcs             : https://gitlab.kitware.com/debian/libatl
   Section         : devel

It builds those binary packages:

  libatl-dev - Binary representation of lists of name/value pairs -
development files
  libatl - Binary representation of lists of name/value pairs
  libatl-bin - Binary representation of lists of name/value pairs -
command-line utilities

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://gitlab.kitware.com/debian/libatl

Regards,

--
  Kyle Edwards

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Those RFS are in the "moreinfo" state since more than two years, some of
them are even from 2020, and there has been no follow up from the
submitter of the RFS. Therefore I'm closing them as non actionable.

-- 
tobi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: