Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
From: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:20:10 +0200
Message-id: <20070506102010.GB26263@ngolde.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1178441920.2814.58.camel@localhost>
References: <1178441920.2814.58.camel@localhost>

Hi Bart,
* Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> [2007-05-06 11:14]:
> Is there some agreed abbreviation that can be used in the subject of
> messages posted on debian-mentors to indicate that a mentor intends to
> sponsor a package? 

No.

> If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work?

Sounds good!
Kind regards
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html

Attachment: pgpzeETMp5Oof.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
  - From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>

References:
- request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
  - From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>

Prev by Date: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Next by Date: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Previous by thread: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Next by thread: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread