Re: Upstream maintainer disagree with the package name

[Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net>]

On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:44:46PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote:
> PS: here is part of the dpkg-dev -c result of libglade-perl
> ...
> -rw-r--r-- root/root     74828 2001-02-10 17:07:33 ./usr/lib/perl5/Glade/PerlUIGtk.pm
[...]
> -rw-r--r-- root/root     43005 2001-02-10 17:07:33 ./usr/lib/perl5/Glade/PerlUIExtra.pm
> drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2001-05-19 10:01:54 ./usr/share/
> drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2001-05-19 10:02:11 ./usr/share/man/
> drwxr-xr-x root/root         0 2001-05-19 10:02:26 ./usr/share/man/man3/
> -rw-r--r-- root/root      7199 2001-05-19 10:01:35 ./usr/share/man/man3/Glade::PerlGenerate.3pm.gz
> ...
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root      1520 2001-05-19 10:01:33 ./usr/bin/glade2perl

Hi, (Remi? Rimi? mutt doesn't display the second character, as you can see).
Well, as far as I can see, because of the glade2perl, and the fact that it
also has perl libraries, I'd be tempted to say it was a binary package with
libraries.

However, if its main purpose was to have those libraries, and the glade2perl
binary is just a small offshoot that doesn't really matter, I'd say it was a
library.

Regards,
:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone		<daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net> <daniel@kabuki.sfarc.net>