[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: version numbering vor beta releases



On 1 Oct 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> Hi,
> >>"Martin" == Martin Bialasinski <martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de> writes:
> 
>  Martin> I want to make a programm version 2.0, but I want to release some
>  Martin> betas before this. What version scheme should I use for the betas, so
>  Martin> that dpkg recognises the 2.0 release to be newer than the betas?
> 
> 	There are no good methods. I like what Emacsen and Linux
>  kernels use (or used tro use, until 2.1 stuff): 1.999.01; 1.999.02,
>  etc.
> 
> 	You may reserve the Z.999.XX for betas for all time ;-)

Well, I would say that among the methods people call "bad",
this one is the one I like most (in fact, I don't think it is so bad,
after all).

-- 
 "361fff15d5f51eb3fe4b8c1217acf459" (a truly random sig)


Reply to: