Re: Bug#507436: ITP: jalview -- multiple alignment editor
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:54:24AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Steffen Moeller wrote:
>>
>>>> I think that there is no problem if you maintain it with the Java team.
>>> :) why isn't anybody mentioning pkg-escience ?
>> ... because there is no clear structure in all these package teams?
>>
>> I wished there would be some cleanup inbetween all these teams with
>> similar scope.
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> the more we package in teams, the more pakages will have to be arbitrarly
> hosted by one or the other. But there may be a solution. I will come up next
> year with a proposal in wich Joey Hess' multiple repository (mr) tool is used
> to manage overlapping package farms.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/mr
That is interesting.
My comment regarding pkg-escience was just meant to be funny. One
thought I wanted to contribute to this thread is that Debian Med has
already some positive reputation of providing working packages. I prefer
to have some independent playground from which packages that are readier
to upload may move to Debian Med at a later stage.
Another question is if a too enormous list of contributors would not
possibly pose a security risk, since everyone has access to every
package. I like it as it is today.
Best,
Steffen
Reply to: