Re: LSB woody certification (again)

[Jeff Licquia <licquia@progeny.com>]

Jeff Licquia wrote:
> We've been running i386 testing.  I've arranged to grab a spare Itanium 
> 1 box we've got laying around, so we can know the state of ia64 by 
> tomorrow morning, most likely.

And those results are in:

http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/tjreport-woody-libchk.200312101511.txt
http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/journal-woody-libchk.200312101511
http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/tjreport-woody.200312102112.txt
http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/journal-woody.200312102112

Summary: 80 unwaived failures in lsb-runtime-test.

All of them I've looked at seem to be related to kernel header constants 
such as PATH_MAX and FOPEN_MAX.  So I should probably ask: when building 
libc updates for woody, which version of the kernel headers do you use? 
 The only version available for ia64 seemed to be 2.4.17, which is 
likely the main cause of the problem.