On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:39:28 -0300 "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org> wrote: > block 931847 by 911165 > tags 931847 + moreinfo > thanks > > Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > > > My understanding of the policy is that, if a package supports an > > > alternative init (other than systemd) it must also support sysvinit. > > > > > > Also note that if the check is actually correct, this will create false > > > positive for all the systemd .service files not started at boot > > > (scheduled jobs, dbus activated,...). > > > > The current policy requirement is that everything would need to provide > > a sysvinit script, see https://bugs.debian.org/911165 > > > > Sadly the process to change this is stuck. > > (I'm just applying some routine bug triage here; not a comment on the > bug's merits.) Hm, why the moreinfo tag? This lintian check is clearly way too broad to be useful as-is. At its current state, please demote it to pedantic (or reverting it completely) until it actually is useful. Thanks, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature