[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#710813: marked as done (lintian: Restructure the laboratory/data storage)

Your message dated Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:07:21 +0000
with message-id <56A39729.4060909@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: lintian: Restructure the laboratory/data storage
has caused the Debian Bug report #710813,
regarding lintian: Restructure the laboratory/data storage
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
710813: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710813
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Severity: important

During the current full run, lintian.d.o ran out of inodes (1.9M).  At
the moment, I have disabled experimental which I hope will work around
the problem for now.

Peter Palfrader (weasel) and I had a chat in #debian-admin about this.
It is my understanding that our current approach is not suitable, even
if we have improved a couple of things.

Peter asked if we could move some of this data into a database?  I
thinking that things like index and file-info should fit quite nicely
into a database (and with minimal effort too due to the L::Collect
indirection).

Personally, I think the "strings/" dir is (also?) something we should
look at fairly soon.  Currently it costs us 1 inode per elf binary in
the package (plus some per dir needed to replicate the package layout
for these elf binaries).  We may even have to give up on keeping
"debfiles/" extracted as well.

~Niels

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 18:49:09 +0200 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Severity: important
> 
> During the current full run, lintian.d.o ran out of inodes (1.9M).  At
> the moment, I have disabled experimental which I hope will work around
> the problem for now.
> 
> Peter Palfrader (weasel) and I had a chat in #debian-admin about this.
> It is my understanding that our current approach is not suitable, even
> if we have improved a couple of things.
> 
> Peter asked if we could move some of this data into a database?  I
> thinking that things like index and file-info should fit quite nicely
> into a database (and with minimal effort too due to the L::Collect
> indirection).
> 
> Personally, I think the "strings/" dir is (also?) something we should
> look at fairly soon.  Currently it costs us 1 inode per elf binary in
> the package (plus some per dir needed to replicate the package layout
> for these elf binaries).  We may even have to give up on keeping
> "debfiles/" extracted as well.
> 
> ~Niels
> 
> 

We no longer have a permanent lab on lindsay.d.o

Thanks,
~Niels

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: