[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#743532: lintian: when to say: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file



Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1
Severity: normal

Please do not make lintian report this warning of
 W: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
if the license synopsis line has "with incorrect FSF address".

Here is an example. Lintian reports as:
 W: ... old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
for debian/copyright containing the following. 

Files: m4/intltool.m4
Copyright: 2001 Eazel, Inc.
License: GPL-2.0+ with incorrect FSF address, and with autoconf exception
 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
 (at your option) any later version.
 .
 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 General Public License for more details.
 .
 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
 Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
 .
 As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
 distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
 configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
 the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
 .
 On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License
 Version 2 can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.

----

For me copying "license" text including some associated disclaimer
exactly from the original source seems to be the right thing to do.

Also, I clearly mark "with incorrect FSF address" in the license
synopsis line.

I think lintian should not issue this warning if it is properly
documented in the license synopsis line.

FYI: This debian/copyright is autogenerated here using debmake packaging
helper script.  So "with incorrect FSF address" is always spelled
exactly the same way.  I am hoping people to use this dh-make alternative
so DEP-5 is easily implemented and -dbg packages are easily made.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                       2.24-5
ii  bzip2                          1.0.6-5
ii  diffstat                       1.58-1
ii  file                           1:5.17-1
ii  gettext                        0.18.3.2-1
ii  hardening-includes             2.5
ii  intltool-debian                0.35.0+20060710.1
ii  libapt-pkg-perl                0.1.29+b1
ii  libarchive-zip-perl            1.37-2
ii  libclass-accessor-perl         0.34-1
ii  libclone-perl                  0.36-1
ii  libdpkg-perl                   1.17.6
ii  libemail-valid-perl            1.192-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl           0.03-1
ii  libipc-run-perl                0.92-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl         0.33-2
ii  libparse-debianchangelog-perl  1.2.0-1
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl       0.06~01-2
ii  libtimedate-perl               2.3000-1
ii  liburi-perl                    1.60-1
ii  man-db                         2.6.6-1
ii  patchutils                     0.3.2-3
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]      5.18.2-2+b1
ii  t1utils                        1.37-2

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii  libautodie-perl                 2.24-1
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl             0.18-2
ii  perl-modules [libautodie-perl]  5.18.2-2

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn  binutils-multiarch     <none>
ii  dpkg-dev               1.17.6
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.71-1+b1
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.46-1
ii  libyaml-perl           0.84-1
ii  xz-utils               5.1.1alpha+20120614-2

-- no debconf information


Reply to: