[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#663516: lintian: Should we retire old/reundant tags



Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> writes:
> * Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, 2012-03-11, 15:29:

>> Are we sure that no one is going to do a manual binNMU and not know the
>> new versioning system?  We still do get occasional manual binNMUs.

> I estimate that the number of people who still remember the old style and
> haven't heard of the new style, and feel adventurous to upload binNMUs
> built by hand is about 0.

Yeah, you're probably right.

> Anyway, I believe such a binNMU would be rejected by dak (because it
> couldn't find source for such version).

If that's the case, then I'm definitely fine with dropping this check.

I think there's a pending patch for Policy that was most of the way
through the process that would document our version number conventions
more completely.  I should dig that up.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



Reply to: