[SCM] Debian package checker branch, master, updated. 2.5.1-137-g50287fd
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 8f63e03e6d0812b7b97d271a6fe882d270071803
Author: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Date: Sat Jul 23 12:23:41 2011 +0200
Added test for "killall-is-dangerous" tag
diff --git a/t/COVERAGE b/t/COVERAGE
index c7dbc48..8c446be 100644
--- a/t/COVERAGE
+++ b/t/COVERAGE
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-Last generated 2011-07-20
-Coverage: 658/913 (72.07%), w. legacy tests: 803/913 (87.95%)
+Last generated 2011-07-23
+Coverage: 659/913 (72.18%), w. legacy tests: 804/913 (88.06%)
The following tags are not tested by the test suite:
@@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ po-debconf missing-templates-pot
po-debconf not-using-po-debconf
scripts csh-considered-harmful
-scripts killall-is-dangerous
scripts maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-adduser
scripts maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-update-inetd
scripts mknod-in-maintainer-script
diff --git a/t/tests/shared-libs-ldconfig-scripts/debian/debian/libfish1.preinst b/t/tests/scripts-killall/debian/debian/postinst
old mode 100755
new mode 100644
similarity index 67%
copy from t/tests/shared-libs-ldconfig-scripts/debian/debian/libfish1.preinst
copy to t/tests/scripts-killall/debian/debian/postinst
index 3e67b7e..0e052fe
--- a/t/tests/shared-libs-ldconfig-scripts/debian/debian/libfish1.preinst
+++ b/t/tests/scripts-killall/debian/debian/postinst
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/sh
+
set -e
-ldconfig
+killall fish
#DEBHELPER#
+
diff --git a/t/tests/scripts-killall/desc b/t/tests/scripts-killall/desc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3da46cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/tests/scripts-killall/desc
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Testname: scripts-killall
+Sequence: 6000
+Version: 1.0
+Description: Test for killall usage in maint script
+Test-For: killall-is-dangerous
diff --git a/t/tests/scripts-killall/tags b/t/tests/scripts-killall/tags
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4acecb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/tests/scripts-killall/tags
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+W: scripts-killall: killall-is-dangerous postinst:5
--
Debian package checker
Reply to: